Antiy Labs PTA vs Malheur: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Antiy Labs PTA is a commercial malware analysis tool by Antiy Labs. Malheur is a free malware analysis tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best malware analysis fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security operations teams investigating APT incidents will get the most from Antiy Labs PTA because it combines dynamic sandbox execution with static signature detection specifically tuned for advanced threat artifacts, not just commodity malware. The tool covers the full NIST Detect and Respond cycle through continuous monitoring, malware behavior analysis, and forensic-ready incident tracing, with multi-OS sandbox support including Kylin and WPS that matters if your environment isn't purely Windows. Skip this if your priority is integration breadth; Antiy Labs PTA works best as a dedicated threat analysis appliance feeding into your existing infrastructure rather than as a central correlation platform.
Incident response teams with limited budgets who need to triage unknown binaries will find Malheur's automated behavior analysis valuable for rapid malware classification. The tool's machine learning-driven approach handles thousands of samples without manual reverse engineering, and its 373 GitHub stars indicate active community validation of the analysis output. This is not a replacement for a full DFIR platform; Malheur excels at the initial "what is this file" question but lacks the investigation breadth and reporting capabilities enterprise incident handlers expect downstream.
