ANGOKA Machine Identity Management vs GlobalSign Atlas: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

ANGOKA Machine Identity Management

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing sprawling IoT, embedded, and edge device fleets will get the most from ANGOKA Machine Identity Management because it anchors identities to hardware rather than relying on software-only certificates that attackers routinely compromise. The agent-based architecture supports hybrid environments without forcing rip-and-replace, and the distributed ledger approach for compliance metadata cuts the busywork of manual identity audits significantly. Skip this if your estate is purely cloud-native SaaS with no physical devices; the hardware root of trust overhead is wasted here.

GlobalSign Atlas

DevSecOps teams managing certificate sprawl across Kubernetes and CI/CD pipelines should choose GlobalSign Atlas for automated issuance and renewal that actually integrates with your toolchain, not bolted on after the fact. ACME protocol support, native cert-manager and Kubernetes integration, plus HSM-backed private key protection mean you're not babysitting certificate expiration alerts or managing manual renewal workflows. Skip this if your organization runs on-premises infrastructure exclusively and needs a Private CA entirely within your own data center; Atlas's cloud-hosted model trades some isolation for operational simplicity.