Android port of Radamsa vs Chameleon: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. Chameleon is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Red teamers and penetration testers who need to validate proxy bypass techniques during authorized assessments will find Chameleon's lightweight approach useful; it strips away the complexity of commercial evasion tools and does one thing cleanly. The 512 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal community trust among practitioners who've actually deployed it against filtering systems. Skip this if you're looking for a polished UI or vendor support; Chameleon is a CLI-first tool built by and for operators comfortable reading code.
