Anchore Enforce vs SecretScanner: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Anchore Enforce is a commercial container security tool by Anchore. SecretScanner is a free container security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best container security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams operating Kubernetes environments need Anchore Enforce for its policy-as-code enforcement model, which closes the gap between vulnerability scanning and actual compliance gates in the pipeline. Pre-built policy packs for FedRAMP, NIST, and DISA compliance plus runtime monitoring of live clusters means you're covering both ID.AM (asset inventory) and DE.CM (continuous monitoring) without bolting on separate tools. Skip this if your organization lacks the infrastructure-as-code discipline to maintain JSON policies or if you need vulnerability remediation guidance; Anchore Enforce is strict enforcement, not hand-holding.
DevOps and platform teams scanning container images in CI/CD pipelines should use SecretScanner because it catches 140 secret types without the complexity of proprietary commercial tools, and the 3,273 GitHub stars signal real adoption among engineering teams who've validated it works. The free pricing and standalone design mean you can integrate it immediately without procurement cycles or vendor lock-in. Skip this if you need secrets management, rotation, or policy enforcement downstream; SecretScanner detects and alerts, it doesn't remediate.
