Anchore Enforce vs Meterian BOSSC (Container Scanner): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Anchore Enforce

Mid-market and enterprise security teams operating Kubernetes environments need Anchore Enforce for its policy-as-code enforcement model, which closes the gap between vulnerability scanning and actual compliance gates in the pipeline. Pre-built policy packs for FedRAMP, NIST, and DISA compliance plus runtime monitoring of live clusters means you're covering both ID.AM (asset inventory) and DE.CM (continuous monitoring) without bolting on separate tools. Skip this if your organization lacks the infrastructure-as-code discipline to maintain JSON policies or if you need vulnerability remediation guidance; Anchore Enforce is strict enforcement, not hand-holding.

Meterian BOSSC (Container Scanner)

Startups and mid-market teams building container pipelines need BOSSC to catch vulnerable dependencies before they ship. The tool generates actionable SBOMs with upgrade recommendations, integrates natively into CI/CD workflows, and uses hybrid scanning (open source plus proprietary engines) that cuts false positives where smaller teams lack triage bandwidth. Skip this if you need runtime detection or network policy enforcement; BOSSC stops at the image layer and doesn't monitor what containers do once deployed.