Amazon GuardDuty Tester vs AutoTTP: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Amazon GuardDuty Tester is a free threat simulation tool. AutoTTP is a free threat simulation tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat simulation fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
AWS security teams evaluating GuardDuty need to validate that its detections actually fire in their environment before incidents do; Amazon GuardDuty Tester cuts through sandbox testing by injecting real proof-of-concept findings directly into your account at no cost. The 408 GitHub stars reflect its adoption among teams that discovered their GuardDuty tuning was silencing critical alerts. Skip this if you're not running GuardDuty yet or if your detection validation workflow already includes threat simulation tools; this is purely about understanding what GuardDuty sees and what it misses in your specific setup.
Red teams and penetration testers who need to run repeatable attack chains without rebuilding them by hand should start with AutoTTP. It integrates directly with Empire, Metasploit, and Cobalt Strike, so your existing payloads execute as automated sequences rather than one-off commands, cutting setup time for regression testing and adversary emulation. The tool is free and openly maintained on GitHub with 259 stars, lowering the barrier to adoption in resource-constrained security programs. Skip AutoTTP if you're looking for attack simulation with built-in reporting, compliance mapping, or a web UI; it's a command-line automation layer, not a platform.
