Alpine Security Threat Detection vs Novacoast Threat Hunting: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Alpine Security Threat Detection

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with mature EDR deployments should pick Alpine Security Threat Detection when you need active hunting that actually correlates across your existing tools instead of running parallel to them. The service covers DE.AE and RS.AN functions at the NIST level, meaning they're built to find what your EDR misses and move quickly into forensics, not just flag alerts for your team to triage. Skip this if you're looking for a standalone platform or need heavy automation; this is a managed hunting service that assumes you already have security infrastructure in place and want humans who know how to exploit EDR data for detection.

Novacoast Threat Hunting

Mid-market and enterprise security operations teams with mature network visibility needs should choose Novacoast Threat Hunting when your SOC is drowning in alerts but lacks the analyst bandwidth to hunt effectively; the service pairs continuous network monitoring with human-led investigation, addressing the gap between automated detection and actual incident confirmation. The vendor's 380-person team and hybrid deployment model mean you get dedicated hunters who understand your environment, not just pattern matching against commodity feeds. This isn't the tool for organizations still building basic detection capabilities or those expecting a platform that handles both threat hunting and incident response; Novacoast assumes your monitoring infrastructure exists and your team is ready to act on findings.