Allgress Risk Register vs Seceon aiSecurity Score360: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Allgress Risk Register

Mid-market and enterprise risk and compliance teams need a tool that actually tracks risk ownership across business units instead of letting remediation fall into gaps, and Allgress Risk Register does this through standardized workflows and cross-module escalation from compliance, incident, and vulnerability teams. The platform covers NIST GV.RM and GV.OV functions, meaning it forces you to document risk appetite upfront and feeds monitoring results back into strategy adjustments rather than becoming a static spreadsheet. Skip this if your organization treats risk registration as a one-time audit requirement; Allgress assumes continuous tracking and active ownership, which takes discipline to maintain.

Seceon aiSecurity Score360

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in asset sprawl across cloud, IoT, and OT environments should start here; aiSecurity Score360's continuous discovery and AI-driven risk scoring (300-850 scale) surfaces what you actually own before you can protect it. The platform covers all four NIST GV and ID functions, meaning it closes the gap most teams have between asset inventory and risk quantification. Skip this if you need response automation or remediation workflows; this is a visibility and scoring engine, not an incident response tool.