Allgress Risk Register vs Kovrr Cyber Risk Quantification: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Allgress Risk Register

Mid-market and enterprise risk and compliance teams need a tool that actually tracks risk ownership across business units instead of letting remediation fall into gaps, and Allgress Risk Register does this through standardized workflows and cross-module escalation from compliance, incident, and vulnerability teams. The platform covers NIST GV.RM and GV.OV functions, meaning it forces you to document risk appetite upfront and feeds monitoring results back into strategy adjustments rather than becoming a static spreadsheet. Skip this if your organization treats risk registration as a one-time audit requirement; Allgress assumes continuous tracking and active ownership, which takes discipline to maintain.

Kovrr Cyber Risk Quantification

Risk and compliance leaders at mid-market and enterprise firms who need to translate security spend into board-legible financial language should start with Kovrr Cyber Risk Quantification. The platform's Monte Carlo modeling produces defensible loss projections by scenario and ties control upgrades directly to ROI, solving the perennial "why should we pay for this?" conversation that derails security budgets. Kovrr maps cleanly to NIST GV.RM and GV.OV, meaning you'll actually close the gap between risk appetite statements and capital allocation decisions. Skip this if your board doesn't ask for cyber materiality numbers or your insurance broker handles your exposure math; Kovrr is built for organizations that treat risk quantification as governance, not compliance theater.