Akamai App & API Protector vs Site Blindado WAF: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Akamai App & API Protector

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting APIs alongside traditional web applications should run Akamai App & API Protector; its machine learning self-tuning reduces false positives that plague manual WAF tuning, and hybrid deployment means you avoid rip-and-replace when shifting between on-premises and multi-CDN environments. The platform covers NIST PR.PS and PR.IR consistently, handling both platform hardening and architectural resilience without forcing you to bolt on a separate API discovery tool. Skip this if your primary concern is incident response speed rather than prevention; Akamai prioritizes blocking threats at the edge over post-breach forensics.

Site Blindado WAF

SMB and mid-market e-commerce operators need Site Blindado WAF primarily for its integrated CDN, which collapses two vendor relationships into one contract and cuts latency while blocking attacks at the edge. The platform covers core attack vectors,SQL injection, XSS, brute force, malicious bots,with behavioral learning that reduces false positives without requiring constant tuning. Skip this if you're enterprise-scale and need SIEM integration, advanced API threat modeling, or SLA guarantees from a vendor with established North American support; Site Blindado's 15-person team and Brazil headquarters mean you're trading brand recognition for pricing and regional relevance.