AISI DFIR vs Bluedog Compromise Assessment: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AISI DFIR

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need to move fast on active incidents will find AISI DFIR's managed service model cuts through the hiring shortage for in-house forensics expertise. The Scout and Hunter tools automate evidence collection and persistence removal directly on affected systems, compressing response timelines that would otherwise stretch weeks. The caveat: this is a managed service first, so your team trades hands-on control for speed and specialist depth, making it less suitable for organizations that need full visibility and control over every forensic decision.

Bluedog Compromise Assessment

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need rapid confirmation of active attacker presence in their networks should use Bluedog Compromise Assessment; it combines endpoint persistence analysis with network-wide historical scanning and dark web credential monitoring to answer the critical post-breach question of "are they still here" faster than building that capability internally. The service maps to NIST DE.AE and RS.AN, meaning it prioritizes detection and forensic analysis over remediation guidance, which is exactly what organizations need in the first 72 hours after discovering compromise. Skip this if you're looking for a platform that hands you automated response workflows; Bluedog is forensic triage, not orchestration.