Aikido DAST Scanner vs InQL: 2026 Comparison
Aikido DAST Scanner is a commercial dynamic application security testing tool by Aikido Security. InQL is a free dynamic application security testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best dynamic application security testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and SMB teams that need continuous API security visibility without hiring dedicated AppSec staff should start here with Aikido DAST Scanner. It handles REST, GraphQL, and authenticated flows in a single scan cycle, and the automated Swagger generation means you're mapping attack surface the day you deploy, not weeks later. Skip this if you need SAST or SCA baked in; Aikido is DAST-only, which keeps it fast but leaves code and dependency risk uncovered.
GraphQL API teams embedded in Burp Suite workflows should adopt InQL for its native introspection enumeration and mutation testing capabilities; it catches schema poisoning and input validation gaps that standard web proxies miss entirely. The tool is free and maintains 1,671 GitHub stars, reflecting active community contribution to its attack patterns. Skip this if your GraphQL APIs sit behind strict WAF rules or if you need post-exploitation forensics; InQL excels at discovery and fuzzing but doesn't track API behavior anomalies.
