Advanced Data Pilfering vs Intelligent Waves SHADOW: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Advanced Data Pilfering

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need to validate whether their defenses actually stop data exfiltration should run Advanced Data Pilfering; most pentesting tools test access, not what attackers do once inside. Horizon3.ai's autonomous approach maps high-value assets and simulates realistic data theft across cloud, Kubernetes, and on-premises environments, delivering the threat-informed validation that compliance frameworks like PCI DSS and NIS 2 increasingly demand. Skip this if your team wants a single platform covering vulnerability scanning, SIEM, and incident response; Advanced Data Pilfering is purpose-built for exfiltration testing and doesn't replace your broader detection stack.

Intelligent Waves SHADOW

Teams responsible for proving exploitability across hybrid infrastructure,especially those tired of pentest reports that identify vulnerabilities but never confirm attack paths,should run SHADOW. Its autonomous exploitation without scripts or agents maps how attackers actually chain findings together across external, internal, identity, and cloud environments, and unlimited testing frequency lets you verify fixes actually work instead of guessing. Skip this if you need a traditional pentest vendor; SHADOW replaces continuous validation, not the initial assessment.