aDolus FACT Certificate Validation vs filancore Over-the-air: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

aDolus FACT Certificate Validation

Security teams protecting ICS/OT environments should use aDolus FACT Certificate Validation to detect fraudulent and stolen code signing certificates before malicious firmware reaches operational technology assets. The tool validates certificate chains and authenticates unsigned binaries across ICS software and firmware, addressing GV.SC supply chain risk management where most validation tools assume standard software distribution channels. Skip this if your organization runs primarily Windows/Linux endpoints in IT networks; the value concentrates in OT shops where firmware provenance verification is non-negotiable and certificate spoofing creates physical safety risk.

filancore Over-the-air

Enterprise and mid-market teams deploying embedded Linux devices at scale will get real value from filancore Over-the-air because it replaces fragile PKI certificate chains with verifiable credentials, eliminating a common attack surface in firmware supply chains. The YOCTO layer integration means you're not bolting this on after the fact; it embeds credential validation into your build and update pipeline, which directly addresses GV.SC supply chain risk. Skip this if your devices rarely update in the field or if you need vendor-agnostic firmware signing that works across heterogeneous hardware; filancore's strength is depth within Linux-based industrial systems, not breadth.