Acalvio ShadowPlex vs CyberTrap Engage Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Acalvio ShadowPlex

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with exposed APIs, web applications, or IoT infrastructure should use ShadowPlex to catch reconnaissance and credential attacks before they reach production systems. The platform's external-facing decoys generate high-fidelity threat intelligence in STIX format while monitoring for password spraying and brute-force attempts, directly addressing ID.RA and DE.CM in NIST CSF 2.0. Skip this if your attack surface is entirely internal or if you need deep visibility into post-breach lateral movement; ShadowPlex is optimized for early detection at the perimeter, not incident response.

CyberTrap Engage Platform

Mid-market and enterprise security teams tired of alert fatigue from traditional monitoring will find real value in CyberTrap Engage Platform's deception-first approach; the 95% precision anomaly detection means you're catching actual adversary behavior, not noise. Hybrid deployment and SOAR playbook automation make it practical for teams without dedicated honeypot staff, while the dark web credential monitoring catches compromises before attackers move laterally. Skip this if your priority is endpoint response speed or you're heavily invested in a single cloud provider; CyberTrap prioritizes detection and adversary profiling over post-breach containment, and the small vendor footprint means expect longer sales cycles and tighter integration support than Gartner-adjacent platforms offer.