Acalvio ShadowPlex Advanced Threat Defense vs T-Pot 17.10: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Acalvio ShadowPlex Advanced Threat Defense

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with hybrid infrastructure will get the most from ShadowPlex Advanced Threat Defense because it catches lateral movement and reconnaissance that perimeter tools miss, using AI-powered deception assets across on-premises, cloud, and OT environments simultaneously. The platform's 350+ prebuilt deception assets and agentless deployment mean you're detecting APT behavior within days, not months of tuning. Skip this if your team lacks the SOC maturity to act on high-fidelity alerts or if you're looking for a tool that also handles incident response and recovery; ShadowPlex prioritizes early detection over post-breach containment.

T-Pot 17.10

Security teams building internal threat intelligence programs or red team infrastructure will get the most from T-Pot 17.10; its modular honeypot collection lets you spin up realistic attack surfaces fast without licensing friction. The platform ships with 20+ honeypot types and integrated logging that actually works out of the box, which matters when you're iterating on threat detection tuning. Skip this if you need managed threat hunting or a vendor to own your honeypot operations; T-Pot demands hands-on configuration and assumes you have the Linux ops chops to run it.