Abnormal Inbound Email Security vs GreatHorn Email Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Abnormal Inbound Email Security

Security teams drowning in BEC and vendor compromise attacks will see immediate ROI from Abnormal Inbound Email Security because its behavioral AI catches impersonation attempts that signature-based filters miss entirely. The platform detects zero-day threats without IOCs, integrates via single API call without inline rewrites, and learns from cross-tenant attack patterns to stay ahead of your specific threat actors. Skip this if you need deep SOAR automation or recovery workflows; Abnormal prioritizes detection and remediation over post-incident response orchestration.

GreatHorn Email Security

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in phishing false positives will see immediate value in GreatHorn Email Security's mailbox intelligence and profile-driven threat management, which learn from your actual mail patterns instead of generic rules. The API-based deployment requires no MX record changes, meaning you can pilot this against live inbound traffic without infrastructure rewiring. Skip this if your priority is post-breach recovery and forensics; GreatHorn is built for detection and user-facing remediation, not incident investigation depth.