Abbey Labs vs Exostar Secure Access Manager (SAM): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Abbey Labs

Infrastructure teams managing Terraform-deployed cloud resources across multiple platforms should pick Abbey Labs for access governance that actually integrates with your infrastructure-as-code workflow instead of bolting on afterward. Its Git-based policy versioning and CI/CD integration mean access controls live alongside your Terraform definitions, reducing the disconnect between what your IaC declares and what your identity system enforces. Not the right fit for organizations without substantial Terraform footprints or those needing deep integrations with legacy on-premises systems beyond Active Directory.

Exostar Secure Access Manager (SAM)

Enterprise security teams managing clinical trial ecosystems should use Exostar Secure Access Manager for its purpose-built SSO across 122+ trial applications, eliminating the friction of federated identity management across sponsor and site networks. The platform's automated provisioning workflows combined with real-time audit trails and training compliance tracking directly address FDA and ICH regulatory requirements that generic IAM platforms treat as afterthoughts. Not the right fit for organizations needing broad identity governance across non-clinical workloads; this tool's strength is precisely its narrow specialization in trial access workflows.