A3Sec CTEM vs Zafran: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

A3Sec CTEM: Managed CTEM service for continuous attack surface & threat exposure mgmt. built by A3Sec. Core capabilities include Continuous asset discovery and mapping, including unknown assets, with a dynamic inventory, Real-time visibility into all assets and their exposure levels, Automated attack simulations to validate vulnerability exploitability..

Zafran: Exposure management platform for vulnerability discovery, assessment & remediation. built by Zafran. Core capabilities include Continuous vulnerability discovery across hybrid cloud environments, Agentless vulnerability scanning for Windows and Linux systems, Vulnerability data aggregation and normalization from multiple sources..

Both serve the Exposure Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

A3Sec CTEM differentiates with Continuous asset discovery and mapping, including unknown assets, with a dynamic inventory, Real-time visibility into all assets and their exposure levels, Automated attack simulations to validate vulnerability exploitability. Zafran differentiates with Continuous vulnerability discovery across hybrid cloud environments, Agentless vulnerability scanning for Windows and Linux systems, Vulnerability data aggregation and normalization from multiple sources.

A3Sec CTEM is developed by A3Sec. Zafran is developed by Zafran. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

A3Sec CTEM and Zafran serve similar Exposure Management use cases: both are Exposure Management tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.