A3Sec CTEM vs Gambit KnightGuard for CTEM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

A3Sec CTEM

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in unknown assets and exposure backlogs will see immediate value in A3Sec CTEM's continuous discovery paired with automated attack simulation; it forces prioritization by actual exploitability rather than CVE noise. The vendor's coverage across NIST ID.AM, ID.RA, and DE.CM reflects genuine strength in asset mapping and risk contextualization where most exposure tools leak. Skip this if your organization prioritizes incident response over exposure prevention or lacks the resources to act on continuous remediation workflows; A3Sec assumes you can operationalize findings at scale.

Gambit KnightGuard for CTEM

Enterprise security teams drowning in vulnerability noise will benefit most from Gambit KnightGuard for CTEM because it actually prioritizes by business impact instead of just CVSS scores. The platform covers the full risk assessment and asset management lifecycle (NIST ID.RA and ID.AM), then adds dynamic reprioritization as your threat posture shifts, which most CTEM tools skip. Skip this if you're a small team looking for a lightweight scanner or need deep integration with your existing SOAR; Gambit is built for large organizations that can staff a dedicated exposure management function.