A-LIGN A-SCEND vs risk3sixty fullCircle GRC: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

A-LIGN A-SCEND

Security and compliance teams running multiple audit frameworks simultaneously will get the most from A-LIGN A-SCEND because its evidence deduplication engine cuts the actual audit workload in half. The platform maps evidence across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, and FedRAMP audits so you're not rebuilding the same control narrative four times, and its FedRAMP 20x Low authorization proves it handles the most demanding federal requirements. Skip this if your organization runs a single compliance framework or hasn't yet centralized evidence collection; the ROI flips when you're managing fewer than three concurrent certifications.

risk3sixty fullCircle GRC

Mid-market and enterprise compliance teams drowning in multi-framework audits will find real value in fullCircle GRC's control harmonization engine, which maps evidence once across SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HITRUST, and other frameworks instead of building separate control matrices for each. The platform covers governance and risk management functions heavily (NIST GV.RM, GV.RR, GV.SC all represented), with particular strength in ownership assignment and vendor risk tracking where many competitors stay shallow. Skip this if your primary need is real-time detection and response; fullCircle is audit infrastructure, not threat intelligence, and works best for teams with dedicated compliance headcount to operationalize the system.