3rdRisk Platform vs VivoSecurity: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

3rdRisk Platform

Mid-market and enterprise buyers managing vendors across multiple regulatory domains will get the most from 3rdRisk Platform because it handles security, privacy, compliance, and sustainability risks in one workspace instead of forcing separate tools per domain. The platform maps directly to NIST GV.SC and DE.CM, with continuous monitoring and real-time alerts that catch vendor incidents before they become your incident; DORA and NIS-2 compliance templates are built in rather than bolted on. Skip this if your vendor ecosystem is under 50 third parties or you need deep integrations with your existing GRC platform; 3rdRisk is strongest when you're consolidating multiple point solutions rather than supplementing an incumbent.

VivoSecurity

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in vendor questionnaires will appreciate VivoSecurity's empirical approach to quantifying breach risk instead of relying on subjective assessment scores. The platform uses regression modeling to forecast data breach probability across your vendor portfolio and supports regulatory documentation for SR11-7, HIPAA, and NIST 800.30 compliance, which matters if your audit team is already asking for model validation. This is not for organizations seeking a broad third-party risk platform that also handles contract management or vendor communication; VivoSecurity is deliberately focused on the quantification and risk appetite definition problem, leaving workflow and collaboration to other tools.