What is the difference between 1stProtect.ai vs Tracee eBPF Runtime Security?

**1stProtect.ai**: Runtime enforcement platform with 22 modules on one SIGMA engine, offline-capable. built by 1stProtect.ai. Core capabilities include Single user-space SIGMA engine replacing multiple legacy security engines (EPP, EDR, DLP, IAM, ITDR, SASE), 22 protection modules covering credential theft, ransomware, data exfiltration, process injection, browser attacks, and agent self-defense, Offline-first policy enforcement with local policy engine cached in kernel memory — no cloud dependency required.. **Tracee eBPF Runtime Security**: Cutting-edge technology for developing security applications within the Linux kernel.. Both serve the Endpoint Detection and Response market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Who makes 1stProtect.ai vs Tracee eBPF Runtime Security?

**1stProtect.ai** is developed by 1stProtect.ai. **Tracee eBPF Runtime Security** is open-source with 4,043 GitHub stars. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is 1stProtect.ai a good alternative to Tracee eBPF Runtime Security?

1stProtect.ai and Tracee eBPF Runtime Security serve similar Endpoint Detection and Response use cases: both are Endpoint Detection and Response tools, both cover Runtime Security. Key differences: 1stProtect.ai is Commercial while Tracee eBPF Runtime Security is Free, Tracee eBPF Runtime Security is open-source. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

1stProtect.ai vs Tracee eBPF Runtime Security: 2026 Comparison Guide

1stProtect.ai vs Tracee eBPF Runtime Security: 2026 Comparison Guide | CybersecTools

1stProtect.ai

Runtime enforcement platform with 22 modules on one SIGMA engine, offline-capable.

Endpoint Detection and Response

Commercial

Visit Website Details

Tracee eBPF Runtime Security

Cutting-edge technology for developing security applications within the Linux kernel.

Endpoint Detection and Response

Free

Visit Website Details

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature

1stProtect.ai

Tracee eBPF Runtime Security

Pricing Model

Commercial

Free

NIST CSF 2.0 Mapping

Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.

Access via MCP

Core Features

Single user-space SIGMA engine replacing multiple legacy security engines (EPP, EDR, DLP, IAM, ITDR, SASE)
22 protection modules covering credential theft, ransomware, data exfiltration, process injection, browser attacks, and agent self-defense
Offline-first policy enforcement with local policy engine cached in kernel memory — no cloud dependency required
Sub-0.04ms threat enforcement latency with less than 1% CPU overhead, no kernel modules
On-host MCP server for AI-based forensic investigation without cloud round-trip
Immutable forensic snapshots captured at syscall level with JSON-structured telemetry
Kubernetes DaemonSet deployment with no sidecars and no kernel module compilation
Audit Mode for policy baselining before switching to active enforcement

No features listed

Integrations

Splunk

Datadog

Elastic

Sumo Logic

Okta

Azure AD

Ping

JumpCloud

AWS

GCP

No integrations listed

Community

Community Votes

Bookmarks

User Reviews

No reviews yet

Need help choosing?

Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.

Browse Endpoint Detection and Response Create Stack

1stProtect.ai vs Tracee eBPF Runtime Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

1stProtect.ai

Tracee eBPF Runtime Security

Side-by-Side Comparison

NIST CSF 2.0 Mapping

Need help choosing?

1stProtect.ai vs Tracee eBPF Runtime Security FAQ

Related Comparisons

Explore alternatives to:

FEATURED

Stay Updated with Mandos Brief

FEATURED

Stay Updated with Mandos Brief