Exaforce Exabot Investigate vs Zscaler Threat Hunting: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Exaforce Exabot Investigate

Mid-market and enterprise SOC teams drowning in disconnected alerts will get immediate value from Exaforce Exabot Investigate because natural language search cuts investigation time by letting analysts query across cloud identities, configurations, and events in plain English instead of writing complex joins. The platform's semantic model automatically links entities and relationships across AWS, GCP, Okta, and SaaS environments, which directly strengthens DE.CM and DE.AE coverage under NIST CSF 2.0. Skip this if your team needs a generalist SIEM replacement or runs primarily on-premises infrastructure; Exabot is purpose-built for cloud-first shops with mature identity and configuration logging.

Zscaler Threat Hunting

Enterprise and mid-market security teams that lack in-house threat hunting capacity should pick Zscaler Threat Hunting for access to 24/7 expert hunters who analyze 400+ billion daily transactions from your existing secure web gateway, eliminating the blind spot most SOCs have on web traffic attack chains. The service covers NIST DE.CM and DE.AE effectively, meaning detection and analysis are the strength; incident response and recovery get less attention, so pair this with a capable IR program. Skip this if your organization needs threat hunting to also drive your incident response workflows end-to-end; the value here is pure hunting and escalation, not post-breach remediation.