FireEye Detection On Demand vs Yara Python ICAP Server: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
FireEye Detection On Demand is a commercial network sandboxing tool by FireEye. Yara Python ICAP Server is a free network sandboxing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best network sandboxing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Security teams needing fast, authoritative malware verdicts on suspicious files and URLs should run them through FireEye Detection On Demand before deciding whether to block or investigate further. The cloud API processes submissions through FireEye's actual execution engine rather than signature matching alone, giving you analysis depth typically reserved for expensive incident response retainers. Skip this if your team lacks API integration bandwidth or needs behavioral analysis of binaries already running on endpoints; Detection On Demand is triage and verification, not continuous monitoring.
Teams running on-premises proxies or gateways who need to inject Yara rules into content inspection workflows should start here; Yara Python ICAP Server lets you scan URLs and payloads without licensing friction or vendor lock-in. The free tier and 58 GitHub stars signal active use in smaller deployments, and ICAP protocol compliance means it integrates into existing proxy stacks without rework. Skip this if you need centralized threat intelligence feeds, managed cloud delivery, or NIST Respond capabilities like automated remediation; this is a detection-only scanner that requires you to own the rule writing and the operational overhead.
