Aikido Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vs Veribee: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Aikido Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Development teams at startups and SMBs who need SAST without the operational overhead will see immediate ROI from Aikido Static Application Security Testing; the AI-powered false positive filtering cuts the triage noise that kills adoption in resource-constrained shops, and pull request integration means developers catch issues in their workflow instead of in a separate tool. The 16-language coverage handles most polyglot codebases, and automated fix generation reduces the friction of pushing remediation back to engineers. Skip this if you're an enterprise with mature AppSec practices and heavy custom rule requirements; you'll want deeper customization and larger vendor support teams than Aikido's 187-person operation can sustain at scale.

Veribee

Teams shipping code at startup velocity who can't afford false positives drowning their developers will find Veribee's formal verification approach cuts signal-to-noise dramatically compared to rule-based SAST tools. The hybrid deployment model and SOC-2 reporting flatten the compliance overhead for early-stage companies scaling toward mid-market customers. Skip this if you need broad vulnerability coverage across multiple languages and frameworks; Veribee's small vendor footprint means narrower language support and less community tooling integration than established competitors.