Tplmap vs xsshunter_client: 2026 Comparison
Tplmap is a free penetration testing tool. xsshunter_client is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teamers validating template injection exposure across legacy web applications should run Tplmap early in assessments; it detects vulnerabilities across nine template engines (Jinja2, Mako, Twig, ERB, and others) that most generic scanners miss entirely. The 4,000+ GitHub stars reflect active maintenance and real-world adoption by practitioners who need fast command-line enumeration without GUI overhead. Skip this if your scope is Windows/.NET stacks or if you need post-exploitation payload delivery built in; Tplmap finds the hole and proves it works, then hands off to your exploitation framework.
Penetration testers running manual XSS campaigns will move faster with xsshunter_client because it automates payload correlation and callback tracking without requiring infrastructure setup; the free pricing and 255 GitHub stars reflect real adoption among practitioners who've ditched spreadsheet tracking. The injection proxy integrates directly with XSS Hunter's backend, eliminating the manual work of cross-referencing payloads to successful hits. Skip this if you're looking for a standalone vulnerability scanner that finds XSS for you; this tool assumes you're already crafting and injecting payloads.
