KAZUAR Secured Workspace vs Titanium for Linux: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

KAZUAR Secured Workspace

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing high-risk remote workforces need KAZUAR Secured Workspace because hardware-separated dual workspaces eliminate the OS-level compromise that traditional endpoint isolation can't prevent; one processor and encryption layer runs your sensitive data, the other handles untrusted internet traffic. The architecture addresses PR.DS and PR.PS under NIST CSF 2.0 by design, not by detection, which means compromised browsers and malware on the open workspace simply cannot reach your secure partition. This is not for organizations seeking a unified EDR platform with threat hunting and response automation; KAZUAR is containment-first and assumes your detection stack lives elsewhere.

Titanium for Linux

SMB and mid-market teams protecting Linux infrastructure from kernel-level compromise will find real value in Titanium for Linux, which enforces mandatory access control policies that block even root-level tampering. Its hardware-binding capability and firmware modification prevention directly address PR.PS and PR.AA gaps that traditional Linux hardening leaves open. Skip this if your environment is mostly containerized or cloud-native; Titanium is built for on-premises systems where you control the full stack and can afford mandatory access control overhead.