Who makes Anantis TrapEye vs Telnetlogger?

**Anantis TrapEye** is developed by ANANTIS. **Telnetlogger** is open-source with 244 GitHub stars. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Anantis TrapEye a good alternative to Telnetlogger?

Anantis TrapEye and Telnetlogger serve similar Honeypots & Deception use cases: both are Honeypots & Deception tools, both cover Attack Detection. Key differences: Anantis TrapEye is Commercial while Telnetlogger is Free, Telnetlogger is open-source. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Anantis TrapEye vs Telnetlogger: 2026 Comparison Guide | CybersecTools

Anantis TrapEye vs Telnetlogger: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Q: What is the difference between Anantis TrapEye vs Telnetlogger?

**Anantis TrapEye**: Detects intruders the moment they interact with your network. built by ANANTIS. Core capabilities include Deception-Based Threat Detection, Near-zero false positives, Proactive Cybersecurity.. **Telnetlogger**: A simple Telnet honeypot program that logs login attempts and credentials from botnet attacks, specifically designed to track Mirai botnet activity.. Both serve the Honeypots & Deception market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.

Anantis TrapEye is a commercial honeypots & deception tool by ANANTIS. Telnetlogger is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.

CST Verdict

Based on our analysis of core features, integrations, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:

Telnetlogger

Security teams operating networks exposed to IoT botnet reconnaissance will find value in Telnetlogger's narrow, focused approach to Mirai tracking; it logs credential attempts that commercial honeypots often ignore because the volume is too low to justify the overhead. The 244 GitHub stars and active deployment history show it works reliably at scale for teams that simply need visibility into which credentials attackers are testing against Telnet ports. Skip this if you need a honeypot that decoys SSH, RDP, or HTTP traffic; Telnetlogger does one thing and doesn't pretend otherwise.

Data verified May 2026