CBRX AI Security & Governance Consulting vs SolidCore: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CBRX AI Security & Governance Consulting

SMBs and mid-market firms deploying LLMs without a formal AI security program should start here; CBRX AI Security & Governance Consulting builds governance frameworks and threat models purpose-built for generative AI, not bolted onto legacy security playbooks. The vendor maps directly to EU AI Act and NIS2 compliance requirements, which matters if your board is asking whether your RAG systems are actually compliant. Skip this if you need hands-off managed security services or continuous monitoring automation; CBRX is advisory-led and fractional, requiring your team to absorb and operationalize recommendations.

SolidCore

Mid-market and enterprise teams deploying LLM applications need SolidCore to stop GenAI risks before they hit production; the API-layer integration without proxies or agents means you actually get adoption from engineering instead of another unmonitored shadow tool. Coverage of NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, and EU AI Act compliance frameworks puts audit evidence in your hands without the manual work, and the immutable audit log handles the "prove what happened" conversations with regulators. Skip this if your GenAI use is still experimental and you're not shipping to production yet; the compliance burden SolidCore solves won't matter until inference becomes business-critical.