Axiom Security UAR vs Skyhawk Synthesis - CIEM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Axiom Security UAR

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in access review backlogs will move fastest with Axiom Security UAR because it automates the entire campaign lifecycle instead of just surfacing data. The platform ties approval decisions to actual usage patterns and policy violations, cutting through the guesswork that makes traditional reviews take months. Deploy it cloud-only and you're live in weeks without infrastructure overhead. Skip this if your organization lacks structured access policies or treats compliance reviews as a box-checking exercise; UAR assumes you want to enforce governance rigorously, not just document it.

Skyhawk Synthesis - CIEM

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in orphaned cloud permissions will find real value in Skyhawk Synthesis - CIEM because it actually removes unused entitlements instead of just flagging them, which cuts your blast radius when accounts get compromised. The platform covers NIST PR.AA and ID.AM with automated right-sizing that correlates real usage patterns to permission policies, not theoretical ones. Skip this if your cloud footprint is under 50 AWS or Azure accounts or if you need deep PAM integration for on-premises privileged access; Skyhawk is built for cloud-first environments where identity sprawl is the core problem, not a secondary concern.