Signicat Identity Proofing vs Signicat Trust Orchestration: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Signicat Identity Proofing

Mid-market and enterprise fintechs moving fast on regulated onboarding will appreciate Signicat Identity Proofing because it handles 35+ identity methods across geographies without forcing you to stitch together five different vendors. The platform covers both NIST PR.AA (identity management) and GV.SC (supply chain risk) requirements out of the box, and the video-based biometric verification actually works across borderless customer bases where traditional document-only checks fail. This isn't the tool for companies that need identity verification as a bolt-on to a larger IAM platform; Signicat is purpose-built for KYC/AML compliance workflows, which means you're either solving that problem or you're overpaying.

Signicat Trust Orchestration

Mid-market and enterprise finhancement and fintech teams managing complex KYC/AML workflows across multiple geographies will gain immediate value from Signicat Trust Orchestration because its no-code builder eliminates months of custom integration work against fragmented identity and risk data sources. The platform orchestrates across 100+ global risk and identity providers through a single API, cutting the engineering overhead that typically derails onboarding program launches. Avoid this if your compliance team insists on keeping identity verification tooling completely isolated from fraud orchestration; Signicat bundles both into one platform, which simplifies operations but limits vendor optionality if you later want to swap one component out.