Identity Platform vs SecuritySide: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Identity Platform

Mid-market and enterprise security teams replacing password-dependent systems will get the most from Identity Platform because its passwordless architecture with location-based enforcement actually stops phishing attacks rather than just detecting them. The platform covers NIST PR.AA and DE.CM with mutual authentication and automated threat blocking, cutting out the manual response lag that kills other MFA deployments. Skip this if you need deep integration with legacy on-premises systems or require a vendor with 500+ employees; Ironchip's 34-person team and cloud-only model mean you're betting on European scaling and may hit gaps in support during US peak hours.

SecuritySide

Mid-market and enterprise teams handling sensitive transactions or mobile-first user bases should evaluate SecuritySide for its machine learning-based anomaly detection paired with risk-adaptive MFA, which catches fraud patterns that static authentication rules miss. The combination of continuous vulnerability monitoring, mobile app integrity verification, and KYC automation addresses NIST ID.RA and DE.CM together, meaning you're getting active risk assessment woven into your authentication layer rather than bolted on afterward. Skip this if you need a pure SSO replacement for workforce identity management; SecuritySide's architecture is built around transaction security and mobile threat detection, not replacing your Okta or Azure AD.