Forescout Threat Detection & Response vs Seceon aiXDR-PMAX: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Forescout Threat Detection & Response

Enterprise and mid-market security teams with mixed IT/OT environments should pick Forescout Threat Detection & Response for its depth in industrial protocol inspection; the 350+ protocol support and 160+ ICS malware checks give you visibility into critical infrastructure that generic XDR platforms simply don't see. The 180+ integrated data sources and forensic time machine capability mean you can map lateral movement across both IT and OT networks and reconstruct attacks weeks after they happened. Skip this if your environment is purely cloud-native or if you need out-of-the-box SOAR automation; Forescout excels at detection and forensic analysis, not at orchestrating response playbooks across your existing incident management tools.

Seceon aiXDR-PMAX

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with distributed endpoints across multiple clouds will get the most from Seceon aiXDR-PMAX because its behavioral analytics engine catches anomalies that signature-based detection misses, and the automation actually executes remediation instead of just flagging it. The platform covers six NIST CSF 2.0 functions including continuous monitoring and incident mitigation, with particular strength in the Adverse Event Analysis function through its UEBA and behavioral detection. Skip this if you need a point solution; aiXDR-PMAX requires some integration work and assumes you want coordinated detection and response across endpoints and clouds, not standalone EPP.