PC Matic Pro vs Redpalm Endpoint Management & Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

PC Matic Pro

Small IT teams without dedicated security staff should pick PC Matic Pro for its allowlisting approach, which stops malware execution by default rather than playing catch-up with signatures. The platform handles third-party patch management automatically across your fleet, which is where most SMBs actually get breached. Skip this if you need deep threat hunting or forensics; PC Matic Pro prioritizes prevention and operational simplicity over investigative depth, and its on-premises model means you're responsible for your own infrastructure scaling.

Redpalm Endpoint Management & Security

Mid-market and SMB security teams tired of juggling separate endpoint, firewall, and asset management tools should look at Redpalm Endpoint Management & Security; the vendor's model of assigning a dedicated client manager and technical engineer per organization actually means someone owns your security posture instead of leaving you to parse dashboards alone. Coverage across NIST ID.AM, PR.PS, and DE.CM reflects strong asset visibility, patch automation, and continuous monitoring, with notably solid ransomware recovery via file encryption monitoring and rollback. Skip this if you need enterprise-scale threat hunting or advanced EDR analytics; Redpalm prioritizes operational security and managed services over detection depth.