CrossC2 vs Pupy: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CrossC2

Red teams executing multi-platform campaigns will value CrossC2 for doing one thing exceptionally well: extending Cobalt Strike's command-and-control infrastructure to Linux and macOS without rebuilding your entire operational toolkit. The 2,546 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal a tool that actually works in production red team environments, not just in labs. Skip this if your operations are Windows-only or if you need post-exploitation capabilities beyond payload delivery; CrossC2 is strictly a C2 extender, not a replacement framework.

Pupy

Red teamers and penetration testers running structured assessments need Pupy for its genuine cross-platform reach and minimal operational footprint; the 8,948 GitHub stars reflect active community maintenance that keeps payloads functional across Windows, Linux, macOS, and Android without the licensing friction of commercial C2 frameworks. The tool's strength is flexibility and cost, not operational security or defensive evasion,modern EDR will catch it unless you're actively managing MITRE ATT&CK tradecraft. This is not for teams that need polished UI, enterprise support, or built-in OPSEC features; it's for practitioners who know how C2 infrastructure works and want to customize every layer themselves.