Aurva Access Monitoring vs PKWARE PK Protect: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Aurva Access Monitoring

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing databases alongside emerging AI systems will get the most from Aurva Access Monitoring because it's one of the few platforms that treats agentic access as a first-class security problem, not an afterthought. The vendor covers seven NIST CSF 2.0 functions including Continuous Monitoring and Data Security, with particular strength in real-time detection of unusual access patterns across data flows and AI workloads. Skip this if your primary concern is compliance reporting and audit trails rather than behavioral anomalies; Aurva prioritizes detection speed over the kind of forensic audit history some regulated industries demand.

PKWARE PK Protect

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with sensitive data spread across mainframes, databases, and cloud will get the most from PKWARE PK Protect; mainframe data protection via copybooks is genuinely rare in this category and solves a real problem legacy tools ignore. The platform covers ID.AM and ID.RA well through discovery and classification across hybrid environments, though its data masking and redaction lean toward output protection rather than preventing exfiltration at rest. Skip this if your primary concern is endpoint DLP in motion or if you need a single pane of glass for network and data security; PK Protect is deliberately focused on data itself, not the channels it travels through.