PEzor vs AggressiveProxy: 2026 Comparison
PEzor is a free offensive security tool. AggressiveProxy is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers running adversary simulations need PEzor to pack shellcode and PE files without triggering static signatures that commodity AV will catch immediately. The tool's 2,077 GitHub stars reflect adoption by practitioners who've validated it in real engagements, and its open-source status means you can audit or modify the packing routines if your targets run custom detection. Skip this if you're looking for post-exploitation frameworks with C2 built in; PEzor does one thing,obfuscation,and doesn't bundle command infrastructure.
Red teamers and penetration testers running CobaltStrike-heavy engagements should use AggressiveProxy to skip manual proxy enumeration and jump straight to shellcode generation. The tool cuts reconnaissance time on internal network reconnaissance because it automates the mapping of proxy configs that would otherwise require hours of manual PowerShell scripting. Skip this if you're doing purple team exercises or need to test detection of proxy-aware payloads; AggressiveProxy is offense-only and doesn't help you see what your blue team actually catches.
