PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) vs xsshunter_client: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy) is a free penetration testing tool. xsshunter_client is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
PETEP (PEnetration TEsting Proxy)
Penetration testers who need fine-grained control over request and response manipulation will find PETEP worth the setup cost; it's Java-based, open-source, and free, which means no licensing friction for red teams running custom test scenarios. The 225 GitHub stars and active Java ecosystem reflect real adoption among practitioners who value the ability to write custom plugins rather than fight against vendor constraints. Skip it if your team expects a polished UI or needs out-of-box integrations with commercial vulnerability scanners; PETEP rewards operators comfortable building their own toolchain.
Penetration testers running manual XSS campaigns will move faster with xsshunter_client because it automates payload correlation and callback tracking without requiring infrastructure setup; the free pricing and 255 GitHub stars reflect real adoption among practitioners who've ditched spreadsheet tracking. The injection proxy integrates directly with XSS Hunter's backend, eliminating the manual work of cross-referencing payloads to successful hits. Skip this if you're looking for a standalone vulnerability scanner that finds XSS for you; this tool assumes you're already crafting and injecting payloads.
