Pathlock Compliant Provisioning vs TheFence: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Pathlock Compliant Provisioning: Automates risk-aware user provisioning across enterprise applications. built by Pathlock. Core capabilities include Real-time segregation of duties (SoD) conflict detection, Sensitive access risk assessment during provisioning, Centralized provisioning across multiple enterprise applications..

TheFence: AI-powered IGA platform for access rights review, risk scoring & SoD. built by TheFence. Core capabilities include Automated User Access Review (UAR) with AI co-pilot support, AI-based access risk scoring and quantification, Dynamic Access Profiling (DAPP) to automate access assignments and onboarding..

Both serve the Identity Governance and Administration market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Pathlock Compliant Provisioning differentiates with Real-time segregation of duties (SoD) conflict detection, Sensitive access risk assessment during provisioning, Centralized provisioning across multiple enterprise applications. TheFence differentiates with Automated User Access Review (UAR) with AI co-pilot support, AI-based access risk scoring and quantification, Dynamic Access Profiling (DAPP) to automate access assignments and onboarding.

Pathlock Compliant Provisioning is developed by Pathlock. TheFence is developed by TheFence. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Pathlock Compliant Provisioning integrates with SAP, Oracle, Workday, Salesforce. TheFence integrates with Amazon Web Services, Slack, Salesforce, Microsoft 365, Jira Software and 7 more. Check integration compatibility with your existing security stack before deciding.

Pathlock Compliant Provisioning and TheFence serve similar Identity Governance and Administration use cases: both are Identity Governance and Administration tools, both cover SOD. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.