Byos Secure Gateway Edge vs Owl PaciT: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Byos Secure Gateway Edge

Mid-market and enterprise ops teams protecting legacy OT/IoT devices should pick Byos Secure Gateway Edge because it actually deploys without touching your network or asking for driver updates; the plug-and-play model means you segment critical assets in hours, not months. FIPS 140-2 validation and built-in DoS/enumeration blocking give you real containment, not just visibility. Skip this if your priority is asset discovery across unknown OT infrastructure; Byos assumes you know what you're protecting and want to lock it down fast.

Owl PaciT

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams protecting critical infrastructure from lateral movement will value Owl PaciT's hardware-enforced one-way data transfer, which eliminates the attack surface that software-only segmentation leaves open. The two-server architecture with dedicated send and receive appliances running hardened Linux means no bidirectional packet leakage, no matter what malware sits upstream. Skip this if your priority is visibility into OT traffic flows; Owl PaciT enforces isolation over monitoring, so teams expecting real-time anomaly detection on the data diode itself will need separate continuous monitoring tools to satisfy that NIST function.