Byos Secure Edge Platform vs Owl PaciT: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Byos Secure Edge Platform

Mid-market and enterprise operations teams protecting legacy OT networks should evaluate Byos Secure Edge Platform for its hardware-enforced microsegmentation, which isolates each device without requiring network redesign or equipment replacement. The platform's strength in NIST PR.AA and lateral movement prevention means you're getting genuine device-level Zero Trust, not just network policies that legacy PLCs can bypass. Skip this if your priority is forensics and incident response; Byos leans hard into prevention and continuous monitoring, leaving recovery automation to your SOC.

Owl PaciT

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams protecting critical infrastructure from lateral movement will value Owl PaciT's hardware-enforced one-way data transfer, which eliminates the attack surface that software-only segmentation leaves open. The two-server architecture with dedicated send and receive appliances running hardened Linux means no bidirectional packet leakage, no matter what malware sits upstream. Skip this if your priority is visibility into OT traffic flows; Owl PaciT enforces isolation over monitoring, so teams expecting real-time anomaly detection on the data diode itself will need separate continuous monitoring tools to satisfy that NIST function.