Byos Secure Gateway Edge vs Owl DiOTa: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Byos Secure Gateway Edge

Mid-market and enterprise ops teams protecting legacy OT/IoT devices should pick Byos Secure Gateway Edge because it actually deploys without touching your network or asking for driver updates; the plug-and-play model means you segment critical assets in hours, not months. FIPS 140-2 validation and built-in DoS/enumeration blocking give you real containment, not just visibility. Skip this if your priority is asset discovery across unknown OT infrastructure; Byos assumes you know what you're protecting and want to lock it down fast.

Owl DiOTa

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams managing critical infrastructure will get the most from Owl DiOTa because hardware-based data diodes are the only enforcement mechanism that actually prevents exfiltration, not just monitors it. The compact form factor means you can deploy it at distributed OT boundaries without ripping out existing networks, and minimal maintenance keeps your already-stretched OT staff from babysitting another appliance. Not the right fit if you need east-west microsegmentation across a sprawling OT fabric or if your governance team demands software-based solutions that play nicely with existing IT security stacks.