Armis Centrix™ IT/OT Security vs Owl DiOTa: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Armis Centrix™ IT/OT Security

Enterprise and mid-market teams running converged IT/OT environments will get the most from Armis Centrix™ IT/OT Security because it actually maps segmentation policy to device reality instead of just visualizing the network topology. The platform covers all five NERC CIP compliance domains and generates ACLs directly from segmentation rules, which matters when you're auditing brownfield industrial sites where manual segmentation documentation is nonexistent. Skip this if your OT environment is air-gapped or if you need deep forensic visibility into lateral movement after breach; Centrix prioritizes prevention and continuous conformance monitoring over post-incident investigation.

Owl DiOTa

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams managing critical infrastructure will get the most from Owl DiOTa because hardware-based data diodes are the only enforcement mechanism that actually prevents exfiltration, not just monitors it. The compact form factor means you can deploy it at distributed OT boundaries without ripping out existing networks, and minimal maintenance keeps your already-stretched OT staff from babysitting another appliance. Not the right fit if you need east-west microsegmentation across a sprawling OT fabric or if your governance team demands software-based solutions that play nicely with existing IT security stacks.