Orochi vs Rekall: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Orochi is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Rekall is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best digital forensics and incident response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Incident responders who need to crowdsource memory analysis across a team will find Orochi's collaborative framework invaluable; the free pricing and 264 GitHub stars signal active community contribution that turns individual dumps into shared intelligence. It excels at the analytical phase of investigation, letting multiple analysts annotate and compare findings in one place, which most commercial DFIR tools charge heavily for. Skip this if your team lacks Python fluency or needs a polished UI with vendor support; Orochi is built by practitioners for practitioners, not for organizations that outsource forensics entirely.
Incident responders investigating memory artifacts on Linux and Android systems should evaluate Rekall for its plugin architecture and cross-platform capability, particularly when working with older infrastructure where kernel integrity protections are minimal. The tool has 1,999 GitHub stars and remains freely available, making it viable for resource-constrained teams doing post-incident analysis. Skip Rekall if your investigations center on Windows memory dumps or require active vendor support; the project is discontinued, and newer tools like Volatility 3 have displaced it for most modern incident response workflows.
