Egress Protect vs OpenText Core Email Encryption: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Egress Protect

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting sensitive data in Microsoft 365 should choose Egress Protect for its post-send message control, which lets you revoke access and restrict forwarding even after recipients open encrypted email. The tool covers three NIST CSF 2.0 functions (PR.DS, PR.AA, DE.CM), with particular strength in access enforcement through granular controls and continuous audit trails that satisfy compliance auditors. Skip this if you need unified DLP across cloud storage, web, and endpoints; Egress Protect is email-centric and won't replace a platform-wide data loss prevention strategy.

OpenText Core Email Encryption

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in email DLP false positives will appreciate OpenText Core Email Encryption's BMOD engine, which routes encrypted mail through the delivery method least likely to break business workflows,TLS for internal recipients, secure portal for external ones. The platform ships with pre-built policy templates that actually work out of the box, cutting weeks from typical email encryption deployments. Skip this if your organization needs advanced threat detection on encrypted traffic itself; Core Email Encryption secures the channel but doesn't inspect what flows through it.