One Identity Active Roles vs Opal Security Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

One Identity Active Roles

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing hybrid AD and Entra ID environments should pick One Identity Active Roles for its temporal group membership automation, which actually removes stale privileges on schedule rather than requiring manual remediation. Its support for dynamic group rules, AWS Managed AD, and fine-grained delegation across multiple domains addresses NIST PR.AA and GV.RR requirements that most identity tools treat as afterthoughts. Skip this if your organization runs Okta or pure cloud identity with no legacy AD footprint; the value proposition collapses when on-premises Active Directory isn't in the picture.

Opal Security Platform

Mid-market and enterprise security teams wrestling with access creep across cloud infrastructure and SaaS will see immediate ROI from Opal Security Platform; its real-time identity mapping and AI-driven access rightsizing actually shrink the attack surface instead of just auditing it. The platform covers NIST PR.AA and DE.CM strongly, with continuous monitoring for privilege drift and toxic access combinations that most governance tools treat as afterthoughts. Skip this if your org runs primarily on-premise with minimal cloud adoption or if you need built-in PAM for legacy systems; Opal's strength is modern, distributed environments where identities sprawl faster than humans can approve.