Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access vs ON2IT Zero Trust: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access

Security teams managing distributed workforces across multiple cloud regions should prioritize Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access for its refusal to backhaul traffic through centralized gateways, which eliminates the bottleneck that tanks performance in traditional ZTNA deployments. The distributed control plane runs entirely on your infrastructure, not Bowtie's, and WireGuard encryption keeps private keys out of vendor hands, addressing the NIST PR.AA identity and access control requirement without trust dependency. This isn't for buyers seeking integrated secure web gateway capabilities from a single vendor; Bowtie's on-device SWG component is functional but plays second fiddle to its network access core.

ON2IT Zero Trust

Mid-market and enterprise security teams ready to operationalize zero trust will benefit most from ON2IT Zero Trust because it pairs a working implementation methodology with managed detection rather than leaving you to build policy alone. The vendor delivers a six-day readiness assessment, five-step implementation framework, and 24/7 mSOC coverage across two SOCs, addressing the full span from ID.AM asset visibility through RS.MA incident response. Skip this if your organization still needs foundational identity and access controls before committing to zero trust architecture; ON2IT assumes you're past that stage.