Okta Single Sign-On vs UserLock: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Okta Single Sign-On is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by Okta. UserLock is a commercial multi-factor authentication and single sign-on tool by IS Decisions. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best multi-factor authentication and single sign-on fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams managing hybrid infrastructure across cloud and on-premises apps should pick Okta Single Sign-On for its 8,000+ pre-built integrations and phishing-resistant authentication, which eliminate the identity sprawl that makes passwordless adoption fail in practice. The vendor's 7,148-person scale and active directory integration mean you're not betting on a point product that gets orphaned when priorities shift. Skip this if your organization runs primarily on-premises or needs deep endpoint device management alongside SSO; Okta's strength in application access doesn't extend meaningfully into device posture or NIST ID.AM asset discovery workflows.
SMB and mid-market teams managing on-premises or hybrid Active Directory environments need UserLock for context-aware access control that blocks compromised credentials even after MFA bypass. The tool maps directly to NIST PR.AA by enforcing device posture and location checks before granting logon, not just at initial authentication. Skip this if your infrastructure is cloud-native or you lack Active Directory as a core identity system; UserLock's value collapses without AD to anchor on.
