NIC GAP-analys vs Saporo Compliance Risk: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

NIC GAP-analys: Gap analysis tool for NIS2, ISO 27001, CIS Controls & Microsoft Zero Trust. built by Nordic Information Control. Core capabilities include Gap analysis for multiple frameworks (ISO 27001, CIS Controls, Microsoft Zero Trust), Predefined questions and requirement points per security category, Compliance level tracking across four stages..

Saporo Compliance Risk: Compliance and identity risk platform mapping controls to frameworks. built by Saporo. Core capabilities include Maps 500+ controls across ISO 27001, ANSSI, CIS, and MITRE ATT&CK frameworks, Graph-based visualization linking permissions and misconfigurations to compliance frameworks, Complete audit trail tracking all changes with user and timestamp information..

Both serve the Compliance Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

NIC GAP-analys differentiates with Gap analysis for multiple frameworks (ISO 27001, CIS Controls, Microsoft Zero Trust), Predefined questions and requirement points per security category, Compliance level tracking across four stages. Saporo Compliance Risk differentiates with Maps 500+ controls across ISO 27001, ANSSI, CIS, and MITRE ATT&CK frameworks, Graph-based visualization linking permissions and misconfigurations to compliance frameworks, Complete audit trail tracking all changes with user and timestamp information.

NIC GAP-analys is developed by Nordic Information Control. Saporo Compliance Risk is developed by Saporo. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

NIC GAP-analys and Saporo Compliance Risk serve similar Compliance Management use cases: both are Compliance Management tools, both cover CIS. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.